Research Blog #4


Christopher Rabeony
Professor Goeller
Research in the Disciplines: College!
October 20, 2017
Research Proposal

Working Title: The Academic and Psychological effects of Commuting Students.
Topic:
            This paper will discuss the effects of commuting has on college students. I will explore how student’s academic progress and psychological states compare to students who live on campus. By researching the trends in students’ GPA as well as their satisfaction with their living conditions in accordance with their college, I can determine the key differences between commuting students and those that dorm. Once my research is completed, I can identify both the benefits and drawbacks of both living conditions and come to a conclusion on which is more beneficial to college students.
Research Question:
            Does a student’s living situation determine their academic and psychological success in college? Do students who live on campus benefit more than those that commute to school? Are students who live on campus happier or more satisfied with their relationship with the university than those that commute to school? What factors determine all of this?
Theoretical Frame:
            Through research, there are several factors that contribute to a student’s GPA and psychological state in regards to their respective university. A student’s residential situation is a major factor that can create variables in each student’s college career. In “The Disengaged Commuter Student: Fact or Fiction?” authors, George Kuh, Robert Goneya, and Megan Palmer have researched how students who commute to campus are less likely to be as socially and academically engaged as students who live on campus. Students who live far from campus find it more difficult to take advantage of academic resources. This is because commuter students may have constraints on their time due to work, family responsibilities, and travel. As a result commuters spend less time on campus than those that dorm. Author Vincent Tinto researches in his article, “Take Student Retention Seriously: Rethinking the First Year of College,” the lives of first-year college students and their daily lifestyle as a college student. These students have to deal with a number of responsibilities outside of academics, such as part time work, household tasks, and commuting. This lessens their engagement with their college experience. Tinto came to the conclusion that students who have formed a sense of community with their university added intellectual richness to student experience, which led to academic and social success. For authors Newbold, Mehta, and Forbus’ article, “University Commuter Student: Time Management, Stress Factors and Coping Strategies” reveals the stress and mental fatigue students who commute suffer. They discuss the work-class-life balance that commuters have to deal with and how universities need to be more accommodating to these students. In Elizabeth Armstrong and Laura Hamilton’s research, “Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality” the two authors bring forth an even deeper argument. They’re research determined that students who dorm can suffer emotionally as well. More noticeably, lower income students find it hard to become engaged with their school.
            All in these articles have come to the conclusion that found that students that commute are less likely to achieve academic success than their on campus counterparts, and have reported higher levels of stress as well.
Research and Plan:
            The research in “The Disengaged Commuter Student: Fact or Fiction?” by Kuh, Gonyea, and Palmer discusses how students who commute have a much more difficult time getting engaged with the academic resources than what students have. This can lead to students who live on campus have better grades than those that commute. In Tinto’s article, “Take Students Retention Seriously” he details the obstacles that students have to encounter when commuting to campus, especially when living at home. Outside factors taking the time away from student lead them to having their time divided. Newbold, Mehta, and Forbus’s work also detail the mental and academic issues as a consequence of commuting in their works, “University Commuter Student: Time Management” and “Commuter Students: Involvement and Identification” respectively. I plan on using these works as well as the others listed earlier to identify the differences that commuting students and those that live on campus have on their academic and social lives. By identifying these factors I can determine that students that live on campus generally find more success than those that commute.
            Bringing in a different perspective, I will also research how students who live on campus can face their own problems. In Elizabeth Armstrong and Laura Hamilton’s research, “Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality” the experiences of several students show that in certain social situations, students can feel heavily isolated on campus. Students who find themselves as reserved or lacking in resources compared to their peers in residence halls can feel lonely, and represents the negative aspects of living on campus. The two authors have highlighted how less affluent students are indirectly marginalized on campus. They are forced to work part-time jobs to afford living expenses. As a result they have a harder time managing their time to study and socially interact with other students.
            
            Working Bibliography:
1.     Tinto, Vincent. “Taking Student Retention Seriously: Rethinking the First Year of College”. Syracuse University. NACADA Journal, 1999. Print
2.     Armstrong, Elizabeth and Laura Hamilton.  Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2013. Print.
3.     Newbold, Mehta, Forbus. “Commuter Students: Involvement and Identification with an Institution of Higher Education”. Arden, NC: Academy of Educational Leadership. 2011. Print
4.     Newbold, Mehta, Forbus “University Commuter Student: Time Management, Stress Factors, and Coping Strategies”. Arden, NC: Advances in Business Research. 2010 Print.
5.     Kuh, G. D., Gonyea, R. M. and Palmer, M. 2001. “The Disengaged Commuter Student: Fact or Fiction?” Commuter Perspectives 27 no. 1: 2-5.
6.     O'Toole, D., Peterson, S. and Wetzel, “Factors Affecting Student Retention Probabilities: A Case Study.” Journal of Economics and Finance 23. J.N. 1999
7.     "GPA Comparisons." Residence Life, Housing and Dining Services - Missouri State University. Web. 01 May 2017.
8.     Nelson, Danielle, Kaustav Volume Misra, Gail E. Sype, and Wayne Mackie. An Analysis Of The Relationship Between Distance From Campus And GPA Of Commuter Students. Volume 12, Number 1. Web


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Research Blog #1

Image
Topic: On-Campus vs. Commuting I have been a commuter for the majority of my attendance at Rutgers. My first year I was a resident  at the University and resided in a dorm. In order to save money I moved back home, and have been commuting to school for the last three years. I believe that commuting and residing at the dorms each had there pros and cons for my academic and social college experience. I would like to research the statistics of students who both dormed and then commuted and their academic performance as a result. I would also like to look at their social life and if they preferred one over the other.
Read more

Research Blog #8

Case   Because commuter students tend to be from lower to middle class backgrounds, are usually first-generation college students, and are usually less affluent than their residential counterparts I plan on using Elizabeth Armstrong and Laura Hamilton's book Paying for the Party to make a real world representation of my frame. While, Armstrong and Hamilton's book does not expressly use commuter students in their study, they do use residential students who share many of the same qualities. They use students who work part time jobs, are poorer than the normal resident student, and find themselves with fewer  opportunities to take advantage of all of their university's resources. As a result these students are usually socially isolated from their dorm mates. These issues are all similar to the ones that commuter students face. One of the examples I plan on using in the book is of Amanda. Due to her status as a less affluent student she found it hard to find a common connect...
Read more

Literature Review #1

Image
John J. Newbold John J. Newbold, Sanjay S. Mehta, Patricia Forbus. "Commuter Students: Involvement and Identification with Institution of Higher Education."  Academy of Educational Leadership Journal . Pg 141-153 (2011). The reading discusses the conflicts students have with commuting to college. Their academic performances, involvement with their school, and relationships on campus are all affected by their off-campus lifestyle. Part-time work, family, and the stresses of travel are all factors that can affect their academic lives as well. Newbold, Mehta, and Forbus discuss their findings compared to their data on students who reside on campus. The authors for this paper are Dr. John J. Newbold, Sanjay S. Mehta, and Patricia Forbus who are all professors at Sam Houston University in Tennessee. They each are certified marketing professors and have written several papers regarding student struggles in relation to commuting. They together written an article called, Un...
Read more